There were some amazing errors in this game, especially on my partner's board near the end. The other team resigned. If my opponent plays N@e8, I play Qxe8 then Kxe8, B@d7+. If Kd8, R@c8 Nxc8, Qxc8 mate. Did my opponent see all of that? I doubt it. I didn't see it until after the game. I wouldn't have resigned: Black starts with a popular opening line. He then plays Bxf3. This is bad for 3 reasons: 1. Trades are not always good. He would be better off playing d6, to relieve his cramped position. 2. Despite what you might think, knights are not better than bishops in bughouse. 3. After the queen recaptures, white has developed a piece. Black loses another tempo because his rook is hanging: Here I played a bad move, d5. overlooking that it allows Nxe5. In retrospect, I think @c5 was better, threating @d6: Here I play dxe. On fxe, he leaves f7 open for attack. dxe6 leaves c6 op...
Let me give you some idea of how this mate on move 21 came about: So I had this position on move 19. He had played Nf5 and I played @g7: So in this position, on move 13, I played f6. Black is already in trouble. He needed to have a pawn at e6 to stop my advance. Here maybe B@f8 holds out longer, but he is still in trouble. Here with White to move, I played exd and he also played exd. My thought is that Black should play d6 instead of d5. By playing this opening, he is weakening e5 and f5, which helped my attack.
Let's see how this came about. My partner was mated in two, but he took the rook which gave me enough material to mate! I think bughouse is in its infancy. Every player from the best to the worst is trying to prove that a certain method works. The top players' methods work better, but they each have their own style, more than contemporary top chess players. Eventually the top players will all play like computers and there will only be vague traces of distinct styles. The good news is that the weak players will still be trying to discover it for ourselves! A player may win because one of both of his opponents, or their opponent's partner has the same or different misconceptions that they have.
Comments
Post a Comment